Watch Meeting Notes Agent actually work

Input pasted into the Project — raw transcript excerpt, Product/Eng sync:

"...Alice: I really think we need proper RBAC before we onboard the enterprise accounts, otherwise every support request turns into a manual permissions thing. Ben: I hear that but can we not build a whole role system in two weeks, like can we keep it simple, viewer and admin, ship it. Alice: viewer/admin doesn't cover the auditor case. Clara: hang on — who actually owns provisioning right now? Because if nobody owns it this is moot. [crosstalk] Dan: I'll take it. I'll sync with HR on how they're doing seat assignment today and come back. Clara: by when. Dan: Friday EOD..."

Agent output:

Meeting: Product/Eng sync — access control scope
Attendees named in transcript: Alice, Ben, Clara, Dan

▸ Decisions
None final. The RBAC scope question was raised but not resolved in this transcript — see Open Threads.

▸ Action Items
1. Dan — Own provisioning; sync with HR on current seat-assignment process and report back to the group. Due: Friday EOD (date unconfirmed — see Flags).

▸ Open Threads (unresolved, needs a decision-maker)
1. RBAC scope: full role model (Alice) vs. viewer/admin only (Ben). Alice's stated blocker against viewer/admin is the auditor case — that objection was not answered on the call. Owner: unassigned.
2. Whether RBAC is a gate on enterprise onboarding. Alice implied yes; not confirmed by anyone with authority in the transcript.

▸ Flags
— "Friday EOD" has no calendar date attached. Confirm which Friday before this goes in a tracker.
— Ownership of the RBAC scope decision itself is the real gap here. Dan owns provisioning discovery, which is upstream of the decision, not the decision.
— Ben's "two weeks" reference implies a deadline or sprint boundary not otherwise stated. Worth confirming.

▸ Suggested follow-up message to the group
"Dan owns provisioning and is syncing with HR — back to us Friday EOD. Still open: do we ship viewer/admin now or build the full role model? Alice's auditor case is the sticking point. Who's making that call, and by when?"

Honest note on the fit — the agent works from whatever transcript you paste in. On this fragment, it can't tell you who has authority to close the RBAC question, because the transcript doesn't say. It flags the gap rather than assigning an owner it can't justify. It also won't write to Linear, Notion, or a calendar; the output is structured text you paste or forward. If you want dates auto-resolved, put the meeting date at the top of the transcript — the template has a slot for it, and relative deadlines resolve from there.